It takes two, baby: A review of unilateral hearing loss in children (Part I)

Children with unilateral hearing loss occupy a “gray area” between normal hearing and what is typically thought of as hearing-impaired children. A review of research shows the unique difficulties these children face in their daily lives.

The first mention of hearing loss in recorded history came from the ancient Egyptians, who in 1550 B.C. treated a “bewitched” ear by pouring a mixture of tree oils and medicinal clay into the affected ear.1 To say our understanding of hearing loss has come a long way since then would be an understatement! Today, people with hearing loss have access to advanced amplification technologies, strong social support networks, and an array of federally-mandated intervention services. As the detrimental impact of bilateral hearing loss is so well-established, federally-mandated protocols exist to identify, treat, and support those children diagnosed with hearing loss. Unfortunately, it has taken far longer to understand the impact of unilateral hearing loss on children.

Defined by the presence of normal hearing in one ear and permanent hearing loss in the other, unilateral hearing loss, or UHL, can be caused by a congenital condition or acquired later in childhood as a result of illness, injury, or disease. While current estimates place the percentage of children in the United States with UHL between 3% and 6.3% of the pediatric population,2 estimates gleaned from previous studies have varied considerably. Prior to the implementation of universal newborn hearing screenings (UNHS) in hospitals across the United States, the average age of diagnosis for a child with UHL was 4.4 years of age.3 While some of this can be attributed to children with UHL acquiring the condition after birth, many children with UHL were missed because they are less likely to demonstrate expressive language delays traditionally associated with bilateral hearing loss.4 Fortunately, the introduction of UNHS has seen the average age of diagnosis of UHL drop to around 2.6 years of age.3 This allows for much earlier intervention than was previously achievable.

Since UHL involves the presence of a normal hearing ear, many children with UHL exhibit little to no symptoms of hearing loss when listening in quiet.4 Rather the primary effect of UHL is the inability to utilize binaural cues. With hearing loss on only one side, binaural summation, binaural squelch, and interaural time and level differences are diminished or lost entirely. Without these binaural cues, children with UHL often demonstrate difficulty hearing in the presence of noise, difficulty localizing to sounds, and difficulty hearing sounds coming from the impaired side.5 The loss of these binaural cues is particularly detrimental to children given the difficult listening environment of the modern classroom.

Research suggests UHL has implications beyond just difficulty hearing in the classroom. A 2010 fMRI (functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging) study of children with UHL demonstrated significant differences in areas of neural activation during auditory tasks than normal hearing children, with many of the UHL subjects unable to activate the auditory centers and binaural attention centers of the brain.6 In a 2013 pilot study by Ead, Hale, DeAlwis, and Lieu, children with UHL performed significantly poorer on tests of verbal working memory and phonological processing than a control group of normal-hearing siblings. These results suggest UHL has a profound and detrimental impact on the activation of auditory neural networks in the brain. More research is necessary to determine the impact of treatment on these changes and whether or not they can be altered.

Children with unilateral hearing loss face a unique set of challenges and require a comprehensive and individualized treatment approach. Audiologists have many tools to work with in this process, and because of that we will be devoting a second blog post exclusively to management options for UHL. Fortunately, none of them involve pouring tree oils or medicinal clays into the ear canal!

 

To learn more – the Unilateral Hearing Loss in Children Conference will be held in Philadelphia on October 22 – 24, 2017. Topics include the latest implications of UHL, a review of technological management approaches, family-centered perspectives, and discussion on contemporary management strategies. Find more information here.

 

REFERENCES:

1Mudry, A. (2006). Otology in medical papyri in ancient Egypt. The Mediterranean Journal of Otology, 2(3), 133 – 142.

2Ross, D.S., Visser, S.N., Holstrum, W.J., Qin, T., & Kenneson, A. (2010). Highly variable population-based prevalence rates of unilateral hearing loss after the application of common case definitions. Ear and Hearing, 31(1), 126 – 133.

3Ghogomu, N., Umanski, A.M., & Lieu, J.E. (2014). Epidemiology of unilateral sensorineural hearing loss with universal newborn hearing screening. The Laryngoscope, 124(1), 295 – 300.

4Ruscetta, M.N. & Arjmand, E.M. (2003). Unilateral hearing impairment in children: age of diagnosis. Retrieved from http://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/unilateral-hearing-impairment-in-children-1123

5McKay, S., Gravel, J.S., & Tharpe, A.M. (2008). Amplification considerations for children with minimal or mild bilateral hearing loss or unilateral hearing loss. Trends in Amplification, 12(1), 43 – 54.

6Propst, E.J., Greinwald, J.H., & Schmithorst, V. (2010). Neuroanatomic differences in children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss detected using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Archives of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, 136(1), 22 – 26.

Ead, B., Hale, S., DeAlwis, D., & Lieu, J.E.C. (2013). Pilot study of cognition in children with unilateral hearing loss. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 77(1), 1856 – 1860.

Do you like the article?

Comments

2 thoughts on “It takes two, baby: A review of unilateral hearing loss in children (Part I)

  1. This is crap, fearmongering as promotional science. There is harm being done here, to scare parents and promote “early intervention”. Disgusting. Only facts present is that hearing in loud environments and locating the direction of sounds in a busy setting can be difficult for one eared people, and brains adapt and rewire according to what is needed. End of list. Also- I take offense at the title. It does not take two ears to be successful, learn, or be social. Don’t proliferate the spread false information. It does NOT take two ears.

    1. @OneEarIsPleanty: Thank you for your comment. It was never my intent to offend with this article. The purpose of this blog post was to share the results of recent scientific studies regading children with unilateral hearing loss. Awareness of these difficulties allows parents and hearing care providers to make informed decisions regarding the needs of the child. I disagree that encouraging early intervention services is “fearmongering,” as current research suggests early intervention is positively correlated to improved outcomes in children with unilateral hearing loss. Ultimately, the best treatment protocol is one that takes into consideration the unique needs and abilities of the child.

Comments are closed.

Author

Articles of interest

Bridging the gap in hearing healthcare for Indigenous communities

Through research and a community-driven project, Inuit children now have improved access to learning, thanks to enhanced classroom acoustics made possible by the implementation of Roger™ SoundField systems in classrooms across Nunavut. However, this initiative underscores the need for a more comprehensive strategy for delivering hearing healthcare in Nunavut.